P402
P402.io
·Meter·Real Estate
·Tempo MainnetDemo

Tenant screening
at sub-penny cost.

3 applicant scenarios. 4 documents each. Gemini Flash extracts structured fields from every document.

Gemini Pro cross-checks income, identity, and bank statement arithmetic. Inconsistencies surface as ledger events for a human reviewer.

Every AI action settles on Tempo mainnet. Human final decision required: the leasing decision rests with the property manager and follows fair-housing rules.

Synthetic applicantsNo real PIIHuman final decision requiredHUD fair-housing audit posture

Human final decision required. P402 does not approve or deny tenants. The fraud score shown is illustrative; the leasing decision rests with the property manager and follows fair-housing rules.

One-Click Screening
AI-powered tenant application screening · 4 documents · Extraction + Consistency + Fraud Assessment
Applicant Scenarios
1820 Valencia Street, Unit 4B, San Francisco, CA 94110
$3,850/mo · 3× monthly rent = $11,550/mo gross
Three scenarios: clean approval, income mismatch, likely fraud. All documents are synthetic.
Screening Ledger
Per-Applicant Cost Meter
$0.0000000
AI cost
0
Events
0
Settled on Tempo
Ledger events appear here during screening.
vs industry baseline
$~$0.00002
This screening
$30–50
TransUnion SmartMove
$50–80
Manual review
Screening Output
AI Extraction + Consistency Analysis

Select an applicant scenario and click "Screen Applicant" to begin.

What this demo proves
Multimodal Volume Economics

The Scenario A clean applicant costs roughly $0.000022 total across 4 documents, 2 models, full extraction and consistency check. The legacy workflow operating cost is materially higher per applicant; the exact gap depends on the manual or vendor process you are replacing.

Fraud Signal Scoring

Scenario C triggers escalation at score 87 (threshold: 65). The signals: three-way name inconsistency, bank statement arithmetic error, wrong routing number for the claimed geography, unverifiable employer. Each signal is a ledger event with a Tempo proof.

HUD fair-housing audit posture

Every screening step is an immutable record on Tempo: which model ran, which documents were checked, what the output was. The AI never makes the final decision; the property manager does. The AI reasoning is auditable to support a HUD fair-housing review.

> _ NEXT STEP

You've seen the meter work.
Now make it yours.

$0.02–$0.05 per applicant. Manual screening runs $30–80. What do you do with this?

Enterprise BuyerStart Here

I want this for
my company's AI spend

Connect your teams, see real attribution, enforce budget caps, cut model waste. Free tier available — or talk to sales for a white-glove onboarding.

See Plans & Pricing →
Partner / ISVEmbed

I build software
for this industry

You own the vertical. P402 provides the metering, settlement, and cost attribution layer underneath it. White-label or embedded.

Talk to Partnerships →
DeveloperIntegrate

I want to integrate
P402 into my stack

OpenAI-compatible endpoint. Drop-in SDK. Add one header and per-token metering starts. Settlement handled automatically.

Read the Docs →
EvaluatorResearch

I want the full
technical picture

The economic and technical case for per-token AI settlement on Tempo. Protocol spec, whitepaper, and the full P402 story.

Not sure which path?

Most teams start with the enterprise dashboard using their own tenant ID. If you need a guided walkthrough of your specific workflow, request a custom demo.

Request Custom Demo →
P402 Meter · Tempo Mainnet · MPP